<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Biomedical Signal Processing</title><link>myserver</link><description>LLM-filtered feed (biomedical_signal_processing)</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Forecastability of infectious disease time series: are some seasons and pathogens intrinsically more difficult to forecast?</title><link>https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014175</link><description>reply.relevance=8
reply.impact=7

Highest h-index author on this paper: Lauren A. White (h-index 19)
Institution (first &amp; last author): California Department of Public Health

&lt;p&gt;by Lauren A. White, Tomás M. León&lt;/p&gt;

For infectious disease forecasting challenges, individual model performance typically varies across space and time. This phenomenon raises the question: are there properties of the target time series that contribute to a particular season, location, or disease being more difficult to forecast? Here we characterize a time series’ future predictability using a forecastability metric that calculates the spectral entropy of the time series. Forecastability of syndromic influenza hospital admissions for the state of California varied widely across seasons and was positively correlated with peak burden. Next, using archived U.S. state and national forecasts targeting laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and influenza hospital admissions, we investigated the relationship between forecastability and: (i) population size of the forecasting target, and (ii) forecast performance as measured by mean absolute error, weighted interval score (WIS), and scaled relative WIS. Forecastability increased with increasing population size of the forecasting target, and forecasting performance generally improved with higher forecastability when mitigating the effects of population size across scales. These preliminary results support the idea that some targets and respiratory virus seasons may be inherently more difficult to forecast and could help explain inter-seasonal variation in model performance.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014175</guid></item><item><title>How muscle ageing affects rapid goal-directed movement: mechanistic insights from a simple model</title><link>https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014023</link><description>reply.relevance=5
reply.impact=6

Highest h-index author on this paper: Christopher T. Richards (h-index 16)
Institution (first &amp; last author): Royal Veterinary College

&lt;p&gt;by Delyle T. Polet, Christopher T. Richards&lt;/p&gt;

As humans and other animals age, passive and active muscle properties change markedly, with reduced peak tension, peak strain rate, activation and deactivation rate, and increased parallel stiffness. It is thought that these alterations modify locomotor performance, but establishing causal links is difficult when many parameters vary at once. We developed a simplified model of an elbow joint with two antagonistic Hill-type muscles, and varied the associated muscle parameters combinatorially over a large range. For a given parameter combination, we found optimal joint movements that minimized cumulative squared error to a target while starting and ending at rest. Emergent behaviour from the optimisations compared well to ballistic point-to-point arm movements in humans. Age-associated reductions of maximum isometric force, maximum strain rate and activation rate all had detrimental effects on performance, independent of other parameters. In contrast, deactivation time and passive parallel stiffness had no effect on performance on their own, but pronounced interactive effects with each other. Increasing stiffness reduced joint movement time at fast deactivation rates, but increased movement time at slow deactivation rates. This occurs because antagonist muscles resist the passive tension at rest, but are stretched eccentrically by the agonist, amplifying their active resistive force. Fast-deactivating muscles can avoid this resistive effect, allowing the passive stiffness to amplify accelerating force and enhance performance. In all cases, coactivation emerged as optimal during and after the braking period, and during the acceleration phase when stiffness increased. As deactivation time increased, so too did coactivation levels– but coactivation was not generally associated with a reduction in performance. Our simulations offer evidence that age-related changes in muscle strength, activation time and maximum contraction velocity can reduce ballistic performance in a goal-directed task, but the effects of increased muscle stiffness and deactivation time depend on their relative values.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014023</guid></item></channel></rss>